Archive for the ‘Congress Watch’ Category

Lt Col Donald Sullivan, Obama not eligible, NC lawsuit, US Air Force, Elaine Marshall, NC Secretary of State, North Carolina Board of Elections, NC Electoral College, November 7, 2008, US Constitution, Lt Col Sullivan, US Military officer, Natural Born Citizen

February 25, 2009

The first officer in the military that I became aware of being
concerned about Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president is
retired Air Force Lt. Col Donald Sullivan. Lt. Col Sullivan filed
a lawsuit in NC on November 7, 2008, against Elaine Marshall, the
NC Secretary of State, and the NC Board of Elections. I had the
privelege of speaking to Lt. Col Sullivan on several occassions
and discovered that he has great conviction to uphold and defend
the US Constituion. Here are some exerpts from the lawsuit:
“5.1.
Article II, Section I of the United States Constitution, states
in particular part, “No Person except a natural born citizen, or
a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this
constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither
shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have
attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years
a resident within the United States.”

5.2.
Mr. Barack H. Obama was a candidate for United States Office of
President on the 2008 North Carolina ballot. However, to have been
a candidate, Mr. Obama must have met those qualifications specified
for the United States Office of the President, which include, but
are not limited to, being a “natural born” citizen. Upon information
and belief, Mr. Obama has failed to demonstrate that he is a “natural
born” citizen. There are other legal challenges before the Federal
Courts regarding aspects of lost or dual citizenship. Those challenges
further demonstrate my argument that reasonable doubt exists as to the
veracity of the electoral process that would allow such fundamental
questions to exist at this late hour preceding the election.”

 

“5.13.
It was well expected that, after all the public concern that has been
 raised over the preceding months, Mr. Obama would have released for
public or official scrutiny the relevant documentation to back up his
claim of qualification as a “natural born citizen”. His reaction to
public concern and his recent actions in Federal District Court on
9/24/2008 demonstrate that Mr. Obama has no intentions of releasing
said documentation for review or cannot because they do not exist.
The late hour of this request was dictated by the delaying tactics
of Mr. Obama, and the non-responsiveness to citizens’ repeated
requests to the Obama campaign for proof of eligibility.”
“6.3.
There are questions as to where Mr. Obama was actually born, whether
in the United States or abroad, and if his birth was subsequently
registered in Hawaii. There are further questions regarding Mr.
Obama’s United States citizenship, if he ever held such, being
expatriated, and his failure to regain his citizenship by taking
the oath of allegiance once he turned eighteen (18) years of age.
There are additional questions regarding Mr. Obama’s multi-citizenships
with foreign countries, which he may still maintain. To date, Mr.
Obama has refused to prove he is qualified under the U.S. Constitution
and eligible to run for the office of President of the United States
despite requests and recent opportunities to do so in Federal Court.

6.4.
The “certificate” that Mr. Obama has posted on his official WEB site
is a “Certification of Live Birth,” and not a “Birth Certificate” from
Hawaii. There is no indication on even this certificate as to
specifically where the birth took place.”

 

“6.13.
  

At the time of Mr. Obama’s birth in 1961, Kenya was a British Colony.
Subsequently, under the Independence Constitution of Kenya, Mr. Barack
H. Obama, Jr., became a Kenyan citizen on December 12, 1963. There are
no indications or reports that Mr. Obama ever renounced that dual
citizenship conferred either by nature of birth or by virtue of his
father’s Kenyan citizenship. On Mr. Obama’s Senate web site, Mr. Obama
acknowledges his father holds Kenyan nationality but avoids addressing
that he (Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.) also held/holds Kenyan
nationality.”

Lt Col Donald Sullivan lawsuit

Advertisements

Major James R Cannon, Orly Taitz lawsuit, USMC, US Military, Purple Hearts, Obama not qualified, Barack Obama ineligible, US Constitution, Obama ineligible to be COMMANDER IN CHIEF, US Armed Forces, United States Marine Corps

February 25, 2009

When there is a tough job to be done, send in the Marines.
Major James R. Cannon, retired from the United States
Marine Corps, has joined the Orly Taitz lawsuit that
challenges Barack Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS.

“Major Cannon former Marine Corps. joins our action


CONSENT FORM

DATE:_24 February, 2009 
Attn. Orly
Taitz,
Esq.
26302 La Paz, Ste. 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691

 
I
agree to be a plaintiff in the legal action to be filed by Orly Taitz, Esq. in a PETITION FOR A DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT THAT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT of the U.S., nor TO BE  COMMANDER IN CHIEF of the U.S. ARMED FORCES, in that I am or was a sworn member of the U.S. military (subject to recall), and therefore when serving as an active member of the military, I would be unable to follow any orders given by a Constitutionally unqualified Commander In Chief, since by doing so I would be subject to charges of aiding and abetting fraud and committing acts of treason.  

 

TYPED NAME /or Signature: James R. Cannon

POSITION IN THE MILITARY/ Retired as Assistant Director for the reserves, 6th MCD

RANK/ Major

SERVICE BRANCH, United States Marine Corps

DATES SERVED/STATUS: 6 August 1953-1 December 1977 Major Retired

OCCUPATION: Retired (Disabled)….Combat Veteran

ACHIEVEMENTS: Awarded  Silver Star for Conspicuous Gallentry, Awarded the Bronze Star with Combat “V”,Two (2) Purple Hearts, Gold Medal for best Squad Leader in the World, 14 other awards and decorations”

Read more here:

 http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/25/major-cannon-former-marine-corps-joins-our-action.aspx
 

 

 

Continental Congress 2009, Constitutional crisis, We The People Foundation, Video, Obama not eligible, Obama not natural born citizen, Government not accountable, US Constitution, Fundamental Rights, GiveMeLiberty.org

February 15, 2009

Dean Haskins, of Restore the Constitutional Republic, has produced
a video for the We The People Foundation. The video, produced
February 14, 2009, addresses how government is out of control and
not accountable and why we have a economic catastrophy and
Constitutional crisis. Plans for a Continental Congress 2009
are also announced.

“The We The People Foundation is committed to educating Americans
about their Fundamental Rights and the history, meaning and power
of the Constitution, and the essential Principles of Liberty.

Where our servant governments have abused the limited authorities
that the People have delegated, the Foundation confronts and holds
these governments accountable to the federal and state written
Constitutions.”

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org

http://www.givemeliberty.org

http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/

Representative John Mica, United States Representative, FL Representative, US Constitution, US Congress, Florida constituents, The WHY initiative, Restore the Constitutional Republic, Citizen Wells, US Constitution Hall of Shame

February 14, 2009

A letter received by the Citizens Wells blog that was posted
in the US Constitution Hall of Shame on on January 6, 2009:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Congressional oath of office

US Constitution

Hall of Shame

A letter received from Representative John Mica of
Florida regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility issues:

“August 18, 2008
Thank you for your fax message regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility
to run for president. I appreciated hearing from you.

As you know, emails questioning Senator Obama’s eligibility to serve as
President have been circulating in the internet for number of months.
Generally they are considered to be hoaxes and without merit. As you may
know, Senator Obama was born in Hawaii two years after Hawaii became a
state. While I do not support his candidacy for President, I have not
seen evidence that cause me to question his eligibility to run. If valid,
I am confidant these questions would have been raised by Senator Clinton’s
campaign, or one of the several other candidates during the Democratic
primary.

Thank you again for writing.

With my regards and best wishes, I remain

Sincerely,
John L. Mica
Member of Congress”

First of all, in fairness to Representative Mica, his letter was written
August 18, 2008 and he does not provide a litany of falsehoods. If he cares
to respond and look at the evidence, his errors can be forgiven.

Representative John Mica stated:

“Generally they are considered to be hoaxes and without merit.”

Mr. Mica, did you do any research on the eligibility issues surrounding
Obama?

Representative Mica then stated:

As you may know, Senator Obama was born in Hawaii two years after Hawaii
became a state.”

Mr. Mica, how would you or anyone else know for a fact that Obama was born
in Hawaii? Obama has never produced a birth certificate despite many
attempts in court to force him to. Obama, instead has spent hundreds of
thousands of dollars and employed numerous attorneys to avoid proving
eligibility. Furthermore, being born in Hawaii is not sufficient to make
Obama a natural born citizen. If it did, then British citizens vacationing
in Hawaii and delivering a child would enable that British child to be
president.

Why Obama is not eligible

What Hawaii Health Official really said

Latest information on court cases

From the Alan Keyes lawsuit

“A press release was issued on October 31, 2008, by the Hawaii Department
of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Dr. Fukino said that she
had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of
Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures.” That statement failed to
resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation and press accounts.
Being “on record” could mean either that its contents are in the computer
database of the department or there is an actual “vault” original.”

“Further, the report does not say whether the birth certificate in the
“record” is a Certificate of Live Birth or a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.
In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation,
including a signature of an attending physician, is different from a
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certificate of
Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness
and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up
to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value
as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the
allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained.
The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176
allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in
Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question,
whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country. Therefore,
the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified
copy or the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of
the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor against the
birthing records on file at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the
Live Birth.”

flmica1

Senator Mel Martinez, United States Senator, FL senator, US Constitution, Congress, Florida constituents, The WHY initiative, Restore the Constitutional Republic, Citizen Wells, US Constitution Hall of Shame

February 14, 2009

A letter received by the Citizens Wells blog on December 29, 2008
that was posted in the US Constitution Hall of Shame

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

US Constitution

Hall of Shame

A letter received from Senator Mel Martinez regarding
Barack Obama’s eligibility issues:

“Thank you for contacting me regarding President-Elect Obama’s
citizenship. I appreciate hearing from you and would like to respond
to your concerns.

Like you, I believe that our federal government has the responsibility
to make certain that the Constitution of the United States is not
compromised. We must fight to uphold our Constitution through our
courts and political processes.

Article II of the Constitution provides that “no Person except a
natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time
of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office
of President.” The Constitution, however, does not specify how that
qualification for office is to be enforced. As you may know, a voter
recently raised this issue before a federal court in Pennsylvania. On
October 24, 2008, the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania released an order in the case of Berg v.Obama.
In that case, the plaintiff, Phillip Berg, raised the same issue that
your letter raises regarding proof of the President-Elect’s birthplace.
Through his lawsuit, Mr. Berg sought to compel President-Elect Obama to
produce a certified copy of his birth certificate.

The District Court dismissed Mr. Berg’s suit and held that the question
of Obama’s citizenship is not a matter for a court to decide. The court
further noted that voters, not courts, should decide whether a particular
presidential candidate is qualified to hold office.

Presidential candidates are vetted by voters at least twice – first in
the primary elections and again in the general election. President-Elect
Obama won the Democratic Party’s nomination after one of the most
fiercely contested presidential primaries in American history. And, he
has now been duly elected by the majority of voters in the United States.
Throughout both the primary and general election, concerns about Mr.
Obama’s birthplace were raised. The voters have made clear their view that
Mr. Obama meets the qualifications to hold the office of President.”

Mel Martinez

Senator Mel Martinez states the following:

“Like you, I believe that our federal government has the responsibility
to make certain that the Constitution of the United States is not
compromised. We must fight to uphold our Constitution through our
courts and political processes.”

Mr. Martinez is correct in that statement.

However, Mr. Martinez goes on to say:

“The Constitution, however, does not specify how that
qualification for office is to be enforced.”

That is absolutely false!
The Constitution and Federal Election Laws allow for challenges to the
Electoral College Votes when Congress convenes.

Mr. Martinez goes on to say that Judge Surrick indicated that voters should
vet presidential candidates and that the courts should not determine
citizenship. Mr. Berg’s lawsuit is still before the US Supreme Court.

Mr. Martinez then states:

“And, he has now been duly elected”

Perhaps Mr. Martinez should look up the definitions of duly and
elected.

Mr. Martinez, what about the millions of Hillary Clinton supporters
that were effectively disenfranchised when Obama stole the Democrat
Primary as an ineligible candidate.

Senator Mel Martinez, would you like to clarify what you stated?

Why Obama is not eligible

flmartinez

Senator Jeff Sessions, United States Senator, AL senator, US Constitution, Congress, Alabama constituents, The WHY initiative, Restore the Constitutional Republic, Citizen Wells, US Constitution Hall of Shame

February 14, 2009

Senator Sessions letter Dated January 23, 2009

Compare the letter received above from Senator Sessions to
a letter received by the Citizens Wells blog on December 30, 2008
that was posted in the US Constitution Hall of Shame

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Congressional oath of office

US Constitution

Hall of Shame

A letter received from Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama
regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility issues:

“Thank you for your recent letter regarding President-elect Barack
Obama. I appreciate your comments and welcome the opportunity to
respond.

The Constitution of the United States requires that all candidates
for the office of President must be at least 35 years of age, natural
born citizens, and residents in the United States for the previous
14 years. As you know, stories have circulated that call into question
President-elect Obama’s citizenship. To this end, lawsuits have been
filed allegging that Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United
States, and therefore is constitutionally ineligible for the office
of President.

One of the most highly publicized suits was filed by Philip Berg on
August 21, 2008, in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania. This suit was dismissed on October 24, 2008, and Berg
subsequently filed an appeal. The decision to hear the case is still
pending before the United States Supreme Court. A related suit, filed
by Leo Donofrio, was recently submitted to the Supreme Court. On
December 8, 2008, the court declined to hear Donofrio’s suit.

Senate ethics rules preclude me from becoming personally involved in
pending litigation. I sincerely hope this matter can be fully and
promptly resolved by the courts. In the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact me in the future should you have a question
regarding an issue over which I have jurisdiction.

Thank you again for writing. Your comments and suggestions are always
welcome.

Very truly yours,
Jeff Sessions
United States Senator”

Senator Jeff Sessions, first of all I suppose you should be
congratulated for not spewing a bunch of uninformed or biased
statements, as many of your colleagues have done.
However, you stated the following:

“please do not hesitate to contact me in the future should you have
a question regarding an issue over which I have jurisdiction.”

We are contacting you now. Congress meets on January 8, 2008 to count and
validate the Electoral College Votes. We are asking you carry out your oath
of office and request proof of eligibility from Obama, a candidate who is
not a natural born citizen and probably is an illegal alien. I am certain
this is within the realm of your “jurisdiction.”

Why Obama is not eligible

alsessions

Senator Jeff Sessions, United States Senator, AL senator, US Constitution, Congress, Alabama constituents, The WHY initiative, Restore the Constitutional Republic

February 13, 2009

The letter below was forwarded to Dean Haskins of Restore the
Constitutional Republic.

http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/

As you read the response from AL Senator Jeff Sessions below,
compare this response to other letters from congressmen. Do we
have a conspiracy? At the very least, we have an entire
institution, the US Congress, that has ignored the US Constitution
and pleas from their constituents. Anyone paying attention
during the 2008 presidential elections knows that Obama has
some serious issues when it comes to being qualified for the
US Presidency. A grade schooler could determine Obama is hiding
something based on the fact that he has employed an army of
attorneys and spent great sums to avoid providing legal proof
of eligibility. Senator Jeff Sessions , we will be demanding
straight answers from you.

Conspiracy definitions from Wikipedia:

Conspiracy (civil), an agreement between persons to deceive, mislead, or
defraud others of their legal rights, or to gain an unfair advantage.
 
Conspiracy (crime), an agreement between persons to break the law in the
future, in some cases having committed an act to further that agreement.
 
Conspiracy (political), a plot to overthrow a government

Text of letter:
“Thank you for your recent letter regarding President Barack Obama.
As you are aware, stories have circulated that call into question President Obama’s
-Citizenship. Additionally, various lawsuits have been filed alleging that Obama is not a natural
born citizen of the United States, and therefore is constitutionally ineligible for the office of
president. However, in June 2008, President Obama released a digitally scanned image of his
birth certificate, and Hawaii’s Director of the State Department of Health, Chiyome Fukimo, has
verified its authenticity.
As you may know, on January 8,2009, Congress certified and tallied the Electoral
College results that verified President Obama’s election as the next president of the United
States.
The office of the presidency should be held in high regard and the president treated with
respect, no matter who occupies the position. As we move forward, Americans should expect
Congress and the president to work together to find substantive solutions to the pressing issues
that our nation faces today.
Thank you again for writing. Please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of my staff
if we may ever be of assistance to you.
Very truly yours,

Jeff Sessions

United States Senator
JS: cd”

sessionsletter

Senator Richard Shelby, United States Senator, AL senator, US Constitution, Congress, Alabama constituents, The WHY initiative, Restore the Constitutional Republic

February 13, 2009

The letter below was forwarded to Dean Haskins of Restore the
Constitutional Republic.

http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/

As you read the response from AL Senator Richard Shelby below,
compare this response to other letters from congressmen. Do we
have a conspiracy? At the very least, we have an entire
institution, the US Congress, that has ignored the US Constitution
and pleas from their constituents. Anyone paying attention
during the 2008 presidential elections knows that Obama has
some serious issues when it comes to being qualified for the
US Presidency. A grade schooler could determine Obama is hiding
something based on the fact that he has employed an army of
attorneys and spent great sums to avoid providing legal proof
of eligibility. Senator Richard Shelby, we will be demanding
straight answers from you.

Conspiracy definitions from Wikipedia:

Conspiracy (civil), an agreement between persons to deceive, mislead, or
defraud others of their legal rights, or to gain an unfair advantage.
 
Conspiracy (crime), an agreement between persons to break the law in the
future, in some cases having committed an act to further that agreement.
 
Conspiracy (political), a plot to overthrow a government

Text of letter:

“Thank you for taking the time to contact me about President-elect
Barack Obama’s citizenship status. I always appreciate hearing from
my constituents.
Under the United States Constitution, Section 1 of Article II
contains a clause that states:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the
United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,
shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any
Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to
the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident
within the United States.”
Many have contacted me regarding the numerous claims and lawsuits
circulating on the internet asserting that Obama is not a natural born
citizen and therefore ineligible to become United States President.
However, President-elect Obama has presented his birth certificate,
showing that he was born in Hawaii, and it has been verified and
confirmed by Hawaiian officials. Additionally, the Supreme Court has
declined to act on any of the cases contesting Obama’s citizenship.
On January 8, 2009, Members of Congress were given the opportunity to
contest the issue in a joint session of Congress, but no such
obj ectlon was ralsed during the meeting. By-all accounts,
President-elect Barack Obama meets those requirements. Please be
assured that I will continue to monitor the situation should further
issues arise.
Thank you again for contacting me. If I may be of any further
assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
~~
Richard Shelby
RCS/stt”

 

shelbyletter1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Representative Sue Myrick, United States Congressman, NC Representative , US Constitution, Congress, Charlotte office, North Carolina constituents, The WHY initiative, Restore the Constitutional Republic, Update, February 13, 2009

February 13, 2009

I called the Charlotte NC office of Representative Sue Myrick
today, February 13, 2009. I decided to call the Charlotte
office after contacting the Washington DC office on February
5, 2009 and sending an email to Sue Myrick. I have received
no response. I was prompted to contact Sue Myrick’s office
after the absurd response that a commenter on my blog
received from Andy Polk, an aide of hers. I called this
morning to give Sue Myrick another chance. It appears that
a lot of the problems the public is having in getting
straight answers from congressmen is the filtering of
information being done by their aides. Since I had written
several articles about Sue Myrick as part of the “WHY”
Initiative I wanted to be fair to her. One of these articles
has received approx 2000 views in less than 24 hours.

A nice lady answered the phone. I gave her a brief overview
of why I called. She wanted to pass me on to a press
secretary and I declined. I simply, in fairness, wanted to
inform them of our efforts and resolve to get answers.
I asked that the lady pass this information on to Sue
Myrick.

Obviously Sue Myrick and most people in Congress are very
busy and get many requests. I understand that. I, so far,
have no reason to dislike Sue Myrick. I have heard good
things about her. However, to my knowledge, she has
expressed no interest in the eligibility issues surrounding
Obama. I have no record of her standing up in Congress
and challenging his eligibility or asking questions. If
Andy Polk speaks for her, then we have a problem.

“Ignorance is not bliss.”

Representative Sue Myrick and all members of Congress. We
are going to hold you accountable to the US Constitution
and the American people.

WHY did you believe Obama was eligible?

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/

http://www.restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.com/

Senator Jim DeMint, United States Senator, SC senator, Ian Headley, Aide Headley, US Constitution, Congress, South, Carolina constituents, The WHY initiative, Restore the Constitutional Republic, Update, February 12, 2009

February 13, 2009

From Restore the Constitutional Republic February 12, 2009:

Another Follow-Up to Senator DeMint’s Staffer
Posted February 12th, 2009 by restore
Dear Mr. Headley,
I hope you are doing well.  Because I haven’t heard back from you since my last post of a week or so ago, I did want to provide you with an update on this situation. 
 
At the onset, let me say that I guess I may have been a bit naïve in the belief that Senator DeMint’s relationship with my late brother would have afforded me an opportunity to engage in a forthright dialogue with him regarding why he chose not to fully investigate Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president.  While the answers you supplied seem to indicate that he relied on no actual evidence at all, I was disheartened that the Senator chose not even to reply to me.  At this point, I’m not certain the Senator even saw my request.
 
A colleague of mine, Citizen Wells, has been making similar requests of NC Rep. Sue Myrick, and the result of the ambiguous replies we’ve received in our two inquiries has led to the creation of The WHY Initiative.  Since, through our network of organizations and bloggers, we have fairly immediate access to countless thousands of people across the country, we are spearheading this grassroots effort to be heard by our elected officials—and to hear directly from them, and not their staffers (no disrespect intended).  We will not relent until we get some meaningful answers instead of the Obama camp’s talking points with which the staffers have obviously been provided.
 
Now, how serious are we about this?  Let’s take a look.
 
After our brief exchange last week, I wrote an article detailing it:
 
 
Citizen Wells did as well:
 
 
Then, we called upon faithful patriots across our nation to help us disseminate this information.  Is it working?  Well, again, let’s take a look.
 
Mr. Headley, please do a Google search on your name:
 
 
As of this writing, Citizen Wells’ article ranks third.
 
Now do a Google search of your name, adding “jim demint”:
 
 
As of this writing, that article is Google’s first entry.
 
The voting public IS going to learn the truth—one way or another.
 
Through The WHY Initiative we are going to continue to insist that we receive real answers from those we elected to represent us.  State by state, we will be working to inform the voting public of just how (un)responsive their elected officials are to them.  No answers?  No campaign $upport and no votes.  If those in office will not answer to We the People, then they simply should not be in office.
 
Moreover, we’re not asking for Senator DeMint, or any other elected official, to supply their answers to the public at large; we are asking that they simply enter into a meaningful dialogue with the representatives of The WHY Initiative.
 
I’ll admit that our country is presently in a shambles, and the current administration is working to destroy all we hold dear; but, the position of the organization I chair, as well as scores of other groups, is that this administration is not even a constitutionally valid one, so every piece of this administration’s agenda is criminally fraudulent, and ultimately inconsequential to our great nation.  Once the truth is embraced, this constitutional disaster should end up in our history books as nothing more than a footnote.
 
Just look at what this UPOTUS (Unconstitutional President of the US) and his Democratic cronies are doing.  They are applying their subversive agenda to assure that conservatives will have no meaningful voice in this country for several years.  Why in the world would any truly patriotic statesman not yell to the top of his lungs that there is a constitutional problem that needs to be addressed by Congress?  Exposing the fraud not only exposes the UPOTUS, but also those who were complicit in his crimes (the DNC).  Those who would act on behalf of our Constitution are virtually guaranteed re-election, and historically, will be regarded as heroes.
 
By the way, we have established a new repository of information regarding our elected officials’ lack of due diligence in this matter.  It bears an appropriate name: CongressWatch (https://congresswatch.wordpress.com).
 
Please, Mr. Headley, do not think that I am merely capitalizing on Senator DeMint’s relationship with my late brother, or that I’m trading on Terry’s legacy.  In his short 45-year lifespan, Terry Haskins embraced truth, and truth is something we’re simply not receiving.  I am persuaded that my brother would have led this effort for the preservation of our Constitution.  He never shrank from what was truly important.
 
You’re a nice guy; but now, I want to speak with the Senator.
 
Kindest regards,
 
Dean Haskins
Chairman, Restore the Constitutional Republic
 
P.S.  This article is also being widely published
Read more here: